Contributors guide: Difference between revisions

From DAO Governance Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Craig Calcaterra moved page Contributors Guide to Contributors guide: Capitalization standardization)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
This page outlines the goals and member expectations in the [[DAO Governance Framework project|DGF project]]. This largely follows the [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Contributing_to_Wikipedia|principles]] established by Wikipedia.  
This page outlines the goals and member expectations in the [[DAO Governance Framework project|DGF project]]. This follows some of the [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Contributing_to_Wikipedia|principles]] established by Wikipedia. [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Ten_simple_rules_for_editing_Wikipedia#Rule_3._Be_bold,_but_not_reckless|Be bold, but not reckless.]] If you spot an error, correct it. If you can improve an article, please do so. It is important, however, to distinguish boldness from recklessness. Start off small. Begin by making minor modifications to existing articles before attempting a complete rewrite previous contributions. Many new editors feel intimidated about contributing at first, fearing they may make a mistake. Such reticence is understandable but unfounded. The worst that can happen is that your first edits are deemed not to be an improvement and they get reverted. If this does occur, treat it as a positive learning experience and ask the reverting editor for advice.  


== Author style guide ==
== Author style guide ==

Revision as of 19:13, 13 April 2023

This page outlines the goals and member expectations in the DGF project. This follows some of the principles established by Wikipedia. Be bold, but not reckless. If you spot an error, correct it. If you can improve an article, please do so. It is important, however, to distinguish boldness from recklessness. Start off small. Begin by making minor modifications to existing articles before attempting a complete rewrite previous contributions. Many new editors feel intimidated about contributing at first, fearing they may make a mistake. Such reticence is understandable but unfounded. The worst that can happen is that your first edits are deemed not to be an improvement and they get reverted. If this does occur, treat it as a positive learning experience and ask the reverting editor for advice.

Author style guide

Main page: Author style guide

Credit

Please sign in, so we can recognize and attempt to reward any surviving contributions to pages you edit. Pseudonymous identities are supported to protect members’ privacy. Trolling and graffiti with valuable criticism which eventually results in platform improvement will be rewarded. Doxing of any type will be punished with loss of REP. The proper way to encourage healthy communication is by filtering content. 

Governance Philosophy

Main page: Governance Philosophy

Guiding principles

Main page: Guiding principles

Transcendental values

Main page: Transcendental values

Code

See Also

Notes & References