DAO Governance Framework project: Difference between revisions

From DAO Governance Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 65: Line 65:


== See Also ==
== See Also ==
=== Engineering links ===
* [[Main Page|main page]]
*[[DAO Governance Framework project|DGF project]]
*[[DAO Governance Framework|DGF]]
*[[Governance Philosophy|Governance philosophy]]
*[[Guiding Principles|Guiding principles]]
**[[Guiding principles#Individual code of conduct guidelines|Individual code of conduct]]
** [[Guiding Principles#Group governance code of conduct|Group governance code of conduct]]
* [[Contributors guide]]
*[[Ethical Considerations|Ethical considerations]]
*[[Governance Philosophy|Governance philosophy]]
*software specs
**[https://gitlab.com/dao-governance-framework/  See Also Gitlab Repo]
**[https://dgov.io/ dgov.io]
* [[DGF comparisons|Comparisons with other platforms]]
=== Academic links ===
* philosophical motivations
* philosophical motivations
* sociological justifications
* sociological justifications
Line 72: Line 92:
* engineering philosophy
* engineering philosophy
* design plan/roadmap
* design plan/roadmap
* software specs
* code audits
* code audits
* marketing
* marketing
Line 83: Line 102:
** data storage
** data storage
** deSci community
** deSci community
== Notes & References ==
<references />

Revision as of 10:47, 3 July 2023

The goal of the DGF project is to make and provide tools for individuals to engage with their communities and for communities to organize in pursuit of their values. These tools are encompassed in a software framework, called DGF, which helps organizations build governance structures for their DAOs.

The initial instantiation of the DGF project is based on the architecture detailed in these[1] documents.[2][3] However, the system is designed to be inherently evolutionary and is intended to quickly move beyond the original specifications.

This wiki is intended to record the history of the project, be an official repository of the latest version of DGF, and to serve as a Forum for deliberation on the future direction of the project. We do original research as a rule. We reward original research which remains. We keep a record of old pages, but we replace what is canonical when we agree on a new canonical page.

DAO Governance Framework

Main page: DAO Governance Framework

??should include links to:

Cultural things (such as constitutions and settled laws, agreed upon ways of doing things, design philosophy, values statements, contributors' guide); up-to-date Marketing/Advertisements; fixed Code (!!!), Fixed Plan, Theory, Formulas

DGF solves DAO problems

Main page: DGF Fixes Blockchain

??should include links to anything relatively dynamic, evolving, abstract, ideas, such as:

  • goals/plans for the project
  • roadmap
  • arguments/discussions for and against ideas

Applications

Main page: DGF Applications

Decentralized scientific societies

Main page: Decentralized scientific societies

Decentralized scientific societies (deSci publishing initiative)

Blockchain institutions

Main page: Blockchain institutions

FinTech

Main page: FinTech

Gig jobs

Main page: Gig jobs

Social Groups

Main page: Social Groups

Codebase

https://gitlab.com/dao-governance-framework/

Downloads

See Also

Engineering links

Academic links

  • philosophical motivations
  • sociological justifications
  • legal analyses
  • theoretical economics and game theory arguments
  • mathematical formulas for tokenomics
  • engineering philosophy
  • design plan/roadmap
  • code audits
  • marketing
    • recruitment
    • advertisement of products
    • art repo
  • download the latest software
    • UIs
  • affiliated projects
    • data storage
    • deSci community

Notes & References

  1. Craig Calcaterra and Wulf Kaal (2021) Decentralization, De Gruyter.
  2. Craig Calcaterra (May 24, 2018) On-Chain Governance of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3188374 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3188374
  3. Craig Calcaterra, Wulf Kaal, & Vlad Andrei (February 18, 2018) Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and Anonymous Systems , U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-11, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3125822