DAO Governance Framework project: Difference between revisions

From DAO Governance Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
(19 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The goal of the [[DAO Governance Framework project|DGF project]] is to make and provide tools for individuals to engage with their communities and for communities to organize in pursuit of their values.
The DAO Governance Framework (DGF) project uses blockchain technology to make decentralized business possible. To do this, we provide tools to build [[DAO|DAOs]]. DAOs require IT tools to facilitate their decentralized governance. The core tool of decentralized governance is a meaningful and secure reputation token, [[Reputation|REP]]. The core mechanism of REP tokens in DGF is: 1. REP is minted and given to the person who brings $ to the DAO. 2. The $ doesn't go to the person who earned it; $ is distributed proportionally to everyone who previously has earned REP.
 
This wiki explains the consequences of using this type of REP token for building DAOs. How it solves the problems with current blockchain initiatives. How DGF makes business and social collaboration more efficient. How REP-focused governance can create a system that promotes human flourishing, materially, socially, and spiritually. And how such lofty and abstract values can persist in a system that is simultaneously built from cold, hard, algorithmic execution of digitally codified business and civil contracts.
 
From a wider perspective, the goal of the DGF project is to make and provide tools for individuals to engage with their communities and for communities to organize in pursuit of their values. These tools are encompassed in a software framework, called [[DAO Governance Framework|DGF]].
 
The initial instantiation of the DGF project is based on the architecture detailed in these<ref>Craig Calcaterra and Wulf Kaal (2021) Decentralization, De Gruyter.</ref> documents.<ref>Craig Calcaterra (May 24, 2018) On-Chain Governance of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations, Available at SSRN: <nowiki>https://ssrn.com/abstract=3188374</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3188374</nowiki></ref><ref>Craig Calcaterra, Wulf Kaal, & Vlad Andrei (February 18, 2018) Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and Anonymous Systems , U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-11, Available at SSRN: <nowiki>https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822</nowiki> or <nowiki>http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3125822</nowiki></ref> However, the system is designed to be inherently evolutionary and is intended to quickly move beyond the original specifications. 
 
This [[Main Page|wiki]] is intended to record the history of the project, be an official repository of the latest version of DGF, and to serve as a Forum for deliberation on the future direction of the project. We do original research as a rule. We reward original research which remains. We keep a record of old pages, but we replace what is canonical when we agree on a new canonical page. 
 
To help edit this wiki [[Special:CreateAccount|create an account]]. Contributors are encouraged to consult the [[Author style guide|DGF Author Style Guide]] and [[Contributors Guide|wiki contributors' guidelines]]. Consult the Media Wiki [[mediawikiwiki:Special:MyLanguage/Help:Contents|User's Guide]] and [[mediawikiwiki:Special:MyLanguage/Manual:FAQ|MediaWiki FAQ]] for information on using the wiki software. 


== DAO Governance Framework ==
== DAO Governance Framework ==
Line 6: Line 16:
??should include links to:
??should include links to:


Cultural things (such as constitutions and settled laws, agreed upon ways of doing things, [[Author Style Guide|design philosophy]], [[Transcendental Values|values statements]], [[Contributors Guide|contributors' guide]]); up-to-date Marketing/Advertisements; fixed Code (!!!), Fixed Plan, Theory, Formulas
Cultural things (such as constitutions and settled laws, agreed upon ways of doing things, [[Author style guide|design philosophy]], [[Transcendental values|values statements]], [[Contributors guide|contributors' guide]]); up-to-date Marketing/Advertisements; fixed Code (!!!), Fixed Plan, Theory, Formulas


== DGF solves DAO problems ==
== DGF solves DAO problems ==
Line 24: Line 34:


Decentralized scientific societies (deSci publishing initiative)
Decentralized scientific societies (deSci publishing initiative)
* [[AI Governance DAO|AI Development]]


=== Blockchain institutions ===
=== Blockchain institutions ===
Line 45: Line 57:
''Main page: [[Gig jobs]]''
''Main page: [[Gig jobs]]''


* Code Review DAO
* [[Code Review DAO]]
 
* [[Ride Sharing]]/Delivery
 
=== [[Social Groups]] ===
''Main page: [[Social groups|Social Groups]]''
* [[Scholarship DAO]]
* [[Community development]]
 
== Code ==
Repo: https://gitlab.com/dao-governance-framework/
 
Tech specification: https://spec.dgov.io/
 
Prototype: https://gitea.dgov.io/DGF/dgf-prototype/
 
Demo: https://demo.dgov.io/
 
== Downloads ==
 
== See Also ==


* Ride Sharing/Delivery
=== Engineering links ===
= Codebase =


= See Also =
* [[Main Page|main page]]


*[[DAO Governance Framework project|DGF project]]
*[[DAO Governance Framework|DGF]]
*[[Glossary]]
*[[Governance Philosophy|Governance philosophy]]
*[[Guiding Principles|Guiding principles]]
**[[Guiding principles#Individual code of conduct guidelines|Individual code of conduct]]
** [[Guiding Principles#Group governance code of conduct|Group governance code of conduct]]
* [[Contributors guide]]
*[[Ethical Considerations|Ethical considerations]]
*[[Governance Philosophy|Governance philosophy]]
*software specs
**[https://gitlab.com/dao-governance-framework/&#x20;&#x20;See&#x20;Also Gitlab Repo]
**[https://dgov.io/ dgov.io]
* design plan/roadmap
* code audits
* [[DGF comparisons|Comparisons with other platforms]]
=== Academic links ===
* philosophical motivations
* philosophical motivations
* sociological justifications
* sociological justifications
Line 58: Line 107:
* mathematical formulas for tokenomics
* mathematical formulas for tokenomics
* engineering philosophy
* engineering philosophy
* design plan/roadmap
* software specs
* code audits
* marketing
** recruitment
** advertisement of products
** art repo
* download the latest software
** UIs
* affiliated projects
** data storage
** deSci community


=== Marketing ===
* recruitment
* advertisement of products
* art repo
=== Downloads ===
* UIs
* Block production clients
=== Affiliated projects ===
* blockchains
* data storage
* deSci community
* chat platform


Please sign pages you edit, so we can recognize and attempt to reward any surviving contributions. Pseudonymous identities are supported to protect members’ privacy. Trolling and graffiti with valuable criticism which eventually results in platform improvement will be rewarded. Doxing of any type will be punished with loss of REP. The proper way to encourage healthy communication is filtering content.  I kind of want to encourage graffiti and trolling. We could recognize (maybe even reward) the most affecting posts as contributions to the defensive structure we build. They contribute to our immune system, making us stronger so we can better anticipate new attacks. Quiet angry enemies can be much more damaging in the long run. And those who are expressing their disagreement—even from the outside—can have beneficial consequences to the analysis. They can’t be rewarded too, much. The edge figures must remain on the edge until they contribute to the improvement of the core, not just the defensive walls. So the reward should not be as great as those who actually solve problems that trolls complain about. But complaining is an echo of a positive contribution—maybe a pre-echo—and so makes a positive contribution. Spam is less rewarded (usually punished, actually by DDoS fees) than clever graffiti. But we also don’t want the criticism culture to metastasize.) This means we need to employ some of the trolls that can be tamed somewhat… reward the monsters at the edge who fight the monsters further away from the edge.
== Notes & References ==
<references />

Latest revision as of 11:06, 16 June 2024

The DAO Governance Framework (DGF) project uses blockchain technology to make decentralized business possible. To do this, we provide tools to build DAOs. DAOs require IT tools to facilitate their decentralized governance. The core tool of decentralized governance is a meaningful and secure reputation token, REP. The core mechanism of REP tokens in DGF is: 1. REP is minted and given to the person who brings $ to the DAO. 2. The $ doesn't go to the person who earned it; $ is distributed proportionally to everyone who previously has earned REP.

This wiki explains the consequences of using this type of REP token for building DAOs. How it solves the problems with current blockchain initiatives. How DGF makes business and social collaboration more efficient. How REP-focused governance can create a system that promotes human flourishing, materially, socially, and spiritually. And how such lofty and abstract values can persist in a system that is simultaneously built from cold, hard, algorithmic execution of digitally codified business and civil contracts.

From a wider perspective, the goal of the DGF project is to make and provide tools for individuals to engage with their communities and for communities to organize in pursuit of their values. These tools are encompassed in a software framework, called DGF.

The initial instantiation of the DGF project is based on the architecture detailed in these[1] documents.[2][3] However, the system is designed to be inherently evolutionary and is intended to quickly move beyond the original specifications.

This wiki is intended to record the history of the project, be an official repository of the latest version of DGF, and to serve as a Forum for deliberation on the future direction of the project. We do original research as a rule. We reward original research which remains. We keep a record of old pages, but we replace what is canonical when we agree on a new canonical page.

To help edit this wiki create an account. Contributors are encouraged to consult the DGF Author Style Guide and wiki contributors' guidelines. Consult the Media Wiki User's Guide and MediaWiki FAQ for information on using the wiki software.

DAO Governance Framework[edit | edit source]

Main page: DAO Governance Framework

??should include links to:

Cultural things (such as constitutions and settled laws, agreed upon ways of doing things, design philosophy, values statements, contributors' guide); up-to-date Marketing/Advertisements; fixed Code (!!!), Fixed Plan, Theory, Formulas

DGF solves DAO problems[edit | edit source]

Main page: DGF Fixes Blockchain

??should include links to anything relatively dynamic, evolving, abstract, ideas, such as:

  • goals/plans for the project
  • roadmap
  • arguments/discussions for and against ideas

Applications[edit | edit source]

Main page: DGF Applications

Decentralized scientific societies[edit | edit source]

Main page: Decentralized scientific societies

Decentralized scientific societies (deSci publishing initiative)

Blockchain institutions[edit | edit source]

Main page: Blockchain institutions

FinTech[edit | edit source]

Main page: FinTech

Gig jobs[edit | edit source]

Main page: Gig jobs

Social Groups[edit | edit source]

Main page: Social Groups

Code[edit | edit source]

Repo: https://gitlab.com/dao-governance-framework/

Tech specification: https://spec.dgov.io/

Prototype: https://gitea.dgov.io/DGF/dgf-prototype/

Demo: https://demo.dgov.io/

Downloads[edit | edit source]

See Also[edit | edit source]

Engineering links[edit | edit source]

Academic links[edit | edit source]

  • philosophical motivations
  • sociological justifications
  • legal analyses
  • theoretical economics and game theory arguments
  • mathematical formulas for tokenomics
  • engineering philosophy

Marketing[edit | edit source]

  • recruitment
  • advertisement of products
  • art repo

Downloads[edit | edit source]

  • UIs
  • Block production clients

Affiliated projects[edit | edit source]

  • blockchains
  • data storage
  • deSci community
  • chat platform

Notes & References[edit | edit source]

  1. Craig Calcaterra and Wulf Kaal (2021) Decentralization, De Gruyter.
  2. Craig Calcaterra (May 24, 2018) On-Chain Governance of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3188374 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3188374
  3. Craig Calcaterra, Wulf Kaal, & Vlad Andrei (February 18, 2018) Blockchain Infrastructure for Measuring Domain Specific Reputation in Autonomous Decentralized and Anonymous Systems , U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 18-11, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3125822 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3125822