Criticisms of the DGF project: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→SGF) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Nothing is perfect | * Nothing is perfect | ||
* Financialization is bad It degrades the fundamental human impulse to help without expectation of reward. Under this system, everything is tied to a measured value, then accounted for and rewarded according to whatever system is currently in place, even though that system is necessarily flawed. | * [[wikipedia:Unintended_consequences|Law of Unintended Consequences]] | ||
*[[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Chesterton's_fence|Chesterton's Fence]] | |||
*Financialization is bad It degrades the fundamental human impulse to help without expectation of reward. Under this system, everything is tied to a measured value, then accounted for and rewarded according to whatever system is currently in place, even though that system is necessarily flawed. | |||
· | · | ||
| Line 12: | Line 13: | ||
* Blockchain tech is bad | * Blockchain tech is bad | ||
** Environment | |||
*** PoW uses the amount of energy of Czechoslovakia and it's entirely wasted except for the minor benefit of decentralized consensus | |||
*** Redundancy of decentralized systems is order of magnitude less efficient than centralized databases, independent of PoW | |||
* P2P tech is for criminals | |||
** File sharing is theft: e.g., music and movies | |||
** Bitcoin is only useful for money laundering, drug sales on the internet, sex trafficking | |||
== SGF Criticisms == | == SGF Criticisms == | ||
* '''Greater communication between scientists can lead to bad outcomes.''' Science needs independent validations of a theory to prevent bias. So a platform where they can communicate immediately, without careful consideration beforehand can ultimately harm science. Kevin Zollman, e.g., in discussing the social epistemology of science argues that before a scientist's colleagues' results are validated, the scientist being aware of their claims is likely to prejudice the scientist. Related is how scientific results have a statistical problem, that many measurements historical record converge to the most accurate current result from a biased direction (e.g., because the scientists are probably self-censoring themselves, and not reporting results that are too far at variance with the other results). | * '''Greater communication between scientists can lead to bad outcomes.''' Science needs independent validations of a theory to prevent bias. So a platform where they can communicate immediately, without careful consideration beforehand can ultimately harm science. Kevin Zollman, e.g., in discussing the social epistemology of science argues that before a scientist's colleagues' results are validated, the scientist being aware of their claims is likely to prejudice the scientist. Related is how scientific results have a statistical problem, that many measurements historical record converge to the most accurate current result from a biased direction (e.g., because the scientists are probably self-censoring themselves, and not reporting results that are too far at variance with the other results). | ||
Revision as of 12:45, 1 March 2023
This page collects arguments against the goals and the implementation of the DAO Governance Framework project and their responses.
Fundamental Criticisms
- Nothing is perfect
- Law of Unintended Consequences
- Chesterton's Fence
- Financialization is bad It degrades the fundamental human impulse to help without expectation of reward. Under this system, everything is tied to a measured value, then accounted for and rewarded according to whatever system is currently in place, even though that system is necessarily flawed.
·
Technical Criticisms
- Blockchain tech is bad
- Environment
- PoW uses the amount of energy of Czechoslovakia and it's entirely wasted except for the minor benefit of decentralized consensus
- Redundancy of decentralized systems is order of magnitude less efficient than centralized databases, independent of PoW
- Environment
- P2P tech is for criminals
- File sharing is theft: e.g., music and movies
- Bitcoin is only useful for money laundering, drug sales on the internet, sex trafficking
SGF Criticisms
- Greater communication between scientists can lead to bad outcomes. Science needs independent validations of a theory to prevent bias. So a platform where they can communicate immediately, without careful consideration beforehand can ultimately harm science. Kevin Zollman, e.g., in discussing the social epistemology of science argues that before a scientist's colleagues' results are validated, the scientist being aware of their claims is likely to prejudice the scientist. Related is how scientific results have a statistical problem, that many measurements historical record converge to the most accurate current result from a biased direction (e.g., because the scientists are probably self-censoring themselves, and not reporting results that are too far at variance with the other results).