Talk:DAO Governance Framework project: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "Plan for root page:<br> This is the root page for the DAO Governance Framework project. The goal of the DGF project is to make and provide tools for individuals to engage with their communities and for communities to organize in pursuit of their values. <br> --DAO Governance Framework-- <br> ''Main page: DAO Governance Framework'' [??In Discussion Page: Perception/Judicial ; so it should include links to Cultural things (such as constitutions and settled laws, agree...") |
m (→NOTE) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== NOTE == | |||
Anyone can contribute. To edit this wiki [[Special:CreateAccount|create an account]]. <br> | |||
Click 'Add topic' to separate subjects.<br> | |||
Please sign all comments by typing 4 tildes (~).<br> | |||
:To answer, use colons (:) to indent | |||
::Use two colons (::) to indent twice | |||
:::Etc.<br> | |||
[[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 04:26, 27 March 2023 (CDT) | |||
<br> | |||
=Plan for root page= | |||
This is the root page for the DAO Governance Framework project, so it needs a lot of consideration. Edit right here in Talk whatever comments you have. [[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 08:57, 28 February 2023 (CST) | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
The goal of the DGF project is to make and provide tools for individuals to engage with their communities and for communities to organize in pursuit of their values. | |||
<br> | |||
=DAO Governance Framework= | |||
<br> | <br> | ||
''Main page: DAO Governance Framework'' | ''Main page: DAO Governance Framework'' | ||
| Line 11: | Line 24: | ||
[??In Discussion Page: Perception/Judicial ; so it should include links to Cultural things (such as constitutions and settled laws, agreed upon ways of doing things, design philosophy, values statements, contributors' guide); up-to-date Marketing/Advertisements; fixed Code (!!!), Fixed Plan, Theory, Formulas] | [??In Discussion Page: Perception/Judicial ; so it should include links to Cultural things (such as constitutions and settled laws, agreed upon ways of doing things, design philosophy, values statements, contributors' guide); up-to-date Marketing/Advertisements; fixed Code (!!!), Fixed Plan, Theory, Formulas] | ||
=DGF Fixes Blockchain= | |||
''Main page: DGF Fixes Blockchain'' | ''Main page: DGF Fixes Blockchain'' | ||
| Line 19: | Line 32: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
=Applications= | |||
''Main page: DGF Applications | ''Main page: DGF Applications | ||
| Line 27: | Line 40: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
=See Also= | |||
* philosophical motivations | * philosophical motivations | ||
*theoretical economics and game theory arguments | *theoretical economics and game theory arguments | ||
| Line 51: | Line 64: | ||
''Please sign pages you edit, so we can recognize and attempt to reward any surviving useful contributions. Pseudonymous identities are supported to protect members’ privacy. Trolling and graffiti with valuable criticism which eventually results in platform improvement will be rewarded. Doxing of any type will be punished with loss of REP. The proper way to encourage healthy communication is filtering content. '' | ''Please sign pages you edit, so we can recognize and attempt to reward any surviving useful contributions. Pseudonymous identities are supported to protect members’ privacy. Trolling and graffiti with valuable criticism which eventually results in platform improvement will be rewarded. Doxing of any type will be punished with loss of REP. The proper way to encourage healthy communication is filtering content. '' | ||
<br> | <br><br> | ||
I kind of want to encourage graffiti and trolling. We could recognize (maybe even reward) the most affecting posts as contributions to the defensive structure we build. They contribute to our immune system, making us stronger so we can better anticipate new attacks. Quiet angry enemies can be much more damaging in the long run. And those who are expressing their disagreement—even from the outside—can have beneficial consequences to the analysis. They can’t be rewarded too much, of course. The edge figures must remain on the edge until they contribute to the improvement of the core, not just the defensive walls. So the reward should not be as great as those who actually solve problems that trolls complain about. But complaining is an echo of a positive contribution—maybe a pre-echo—and so makes a positive contribution. Spam is less rewarded (usually punished, actually by DDoS fees) than clever graffiti. But we also don’t want the criticism culture to metastasize.) This means we need to employ some of the trolls that can be tamed somewhat… reward the monsters at the edge who fight the monsters further away from the edge. [[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 08:55, 28 February 2023 (CST) | <-- I kind of want to encourage graffiti and trolling. We could recognize (maybe even reward) the most affecting posts as contributions to the defensive structure we build. They contribute to our immune system, making us stronger so we can better anticipate new attacks. Quiet angry enemies can be much more damaging in the long run. And those who are expressing their disagreement—even from the outside—can have beneficial consequences to the analysis. They can’t be rewarded too much, of course. The edge figures must remain on the edge until they contribute to the improvement of the core, not just the defensive walls. So the reward should not be as great as those who actually solve problems that trolls complain about. But complaining is an echo of a positive contribution—maybe a pre-echo—and so makes a positive contribution. Spam is less rewarded (usually punished, actually by DDoS fees) than clever graffiti. But we also don’t want the criticism culture to metastasize.) This means we need to employ some of the trolls that can be tamed somewhat… reward the monsters at the edge who fight the monsters further away from the edge. [[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 08:55, 28 February 2023 (CST) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:13, 12 July 2023
NOTE[edit source]
Anyone can contribute. To edit this wiki create an account.
Click 'Add topic' to separate subjects.
Please sign all comments by typing 4 tildes (~).
- To answer, use colons (:) to indent
- Use two colons (::) to indent twice
- Etc.
- Etc.
- Use two colons (::) to indent twice
Craig Calcaterra (talk) 04:26, 27 March 2023 (CDT)
Plan for root page[edit source]
This is the root page for the DAO Governance Framework project, so it needs a lot of consideration. Edit right here in Talk whatever comments you have. Craig Calcaterra (talk) 08:57, 28 February 2023 (CST)
The goal of the DGF project is to make and provide tools for individuals to engage with their communities and for communities to organize in pursuit of their values.
DAO Governance Framework[edit source]
Main page: DAO Governance Framework
[??In Discussion Page: Perception/Judicial ; so it should include links to Cultural things (such as constitutions and settled laws, agreed upon ways of doing things, design philosophy, values statements, contributors' guide); up-to-date Marketing/Advertisements; fixed Code (!!!), Fixed Plan, Theory, Formulas]
DGF Fixes Blockchain[edit source]
Main page: DGF Fixes Blockchain
[??In Discussion Page: Thought/Legislative; so it should include links to anything relatively dynamic, such as the evolving goals/plans for the project; roadmap; arguments/discussions for and against ideas]
Applications[edit source]
Main page: DGF Applications
[??In Discussion Page: Action/Executive; ; so it should include links to what’s working, especially IRL or outside the platforms associated projects, such as functioning DAOs]
See Also[edit source]
- philosophical motivations
- theoretical economics and game theory arguments
- mathematical formulas for tokenomics
- sociological justifications
- legal analyses
- marketing
- recruitment
- advertisement of products
- art repo
- download the latest software
- UIs
- affiliated projects
- data storage
- deSci community
- engineering philosophy
- design plan/roadmap
- software specs
- code & code audits
Please sign pages you edit, so we can recognize and attempt to reward any surviving useful contributions. Pseudonymous identities are supported to protect members’ privacy. Trolling and graffiti with valuable criticism which eventually results in platform improvement will be rewarded. Doxing of any type will be punished with loss of REP. The proper way to encourage healthy communication is filtering content.
<-- I kind of want to encourage graffiti and trolling. We could recognize (maybe even reward) the most affecting posts as contributions to the defensive structure we build. They contribute to our immune system, making us stronger so we can better anticipate new attacks. Quiet angry enemies can be much more damaging in the long run. And those who are expressing their disagreement—even from the outside—can have beneficial consequences to the analysis. They can’t be rewarded too much, of course. The edge figures must remain on the edge until they contribute to the improvement of the core, not just the defensive walls. So the reward should not be as great as those who actually solve problems that trolls complain about. But complaining is an echo of a positive contribution—maybe a pre-echo—and so makes a positive contribution. Spam is less rewarded (usually punished, actually by DDoS fees) than clever graffiti. But we also don’t want the criticism culture to metastasize.) This means we need to employ some of the trolls that can be tamed somewhat… reward the monsters at the edge who fight the monsters further away from the edge. Craig Calcaterra (talk) 08:55, 28 February 2023 (CST)