Talk:Reputation tokenomics

From DAO Governance Wiki
Revision as of 10:01, 16 January 2023 by Kung (talk | contribs) (DGF treasury discussion)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Question: Without a treasury, how would a DAO be setup for acute problems? I'm not saying we need a big treasury, I just don't see how the DAO being totally illiquid is practical, vs. ideal. Especially, if the DAO gets more powerful/influential, I don't know how it would handle all of the different attacks without a treasury. Just as there is social redundancy in a decentralized organization, maybe it also needs financial redundancy/inefficiencies as well for survival?

Reference: Reputation Tokenomics, Oct 4 Version - Craig Calcaterra

Context: Reputation tokenomics tries to eliminate treasuries all together and have all incentives pushed to long-term/delayed payment/gratification. DGF focuses on values of stability and the long-term thinking, but DGF will need inevitably face unexpected situations so not investing in the build up of a treasury seems tenuous.

Retrieved from "https://daogovernanceframework.com/w/index.php?title=Talk:Reputation_tokenomics&oldid=15"