Talk:DAO: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== NOTE == | == NOTE == | ||
Click 'Add topic' to separate subjects.<br> | |||
Please sign all comments by typing 4 tildes (~).<br> | Please sign all comments by typing 4 tildes (~).<br> | ||
[[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 00:16, 2 March 2023 (CST) | [[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 00:16, 2 March 2023 (CST) |
Revision as of 04:23, 4 March 2023
NOTE
Click 'Add topic' to separate subjects.
Please sign all comments by typing 4 tildes (~).
Craig Calcaterra (talk) 00:16, 2 March 2023 (CST)
Squishiness
When discussing things like
"The second major reason openness is ideal is that it serves the social good. It is a matter of basic justice that all people in a society are given equal opportunity to participate in all of its institutions. People prefer not to participate in a group that does not serve their values, especially one that limits their opportunities to gain power in the group. More importantly, they should not be forced to participate."
it is difficult to keep an objective, universally inclusive tone. The value judgements that inform the group need to be clear in order to be able to be explicit about what we intend.
Others can be more abstract and objective if they want to perform an autopsy on the project later, but I think we should be unapologetically plain and obvious about our feelings in this wiki. Craig Calcaterra (talk) 05:54, 27 February 2023 (CST)