Talk:DAO Governance Framework: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== NOTE == | == NOTE == | ||
Click 'Add topic' to separate subjects.<br> | |||
Please sign all comments by typing 4 tildes (~).<br> | Please sign all comments by typing 4 tildes (~).<br> | ||
[[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) | :To answer, use colons (:) to indent | ||
::Use two colons (::) to indent twice | |||
:::Etc.<br> | |||
[[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 04:26, 27 March 2023 (CDT) | |||
<br> | |||
== Voting Technical Issues == | == Voting Technical Issues == | ||
Revision as of 03:32, 27 March 2023
NOTE
Click 'Add topic' to separate subjects.
Please sign all comments by typing 4 tildes (~).
- To answer, use colons (:) to indent
- Use two colons (::) to indent twice
- Etc.
- Etc.
- Use two colons (::) to indent twice
Craig Calcaterra (talk) 04:26, 27 March 2023 (CDT)
Voting Technical Issues
The Validation Pool is the heart of the system, so voting with REP is always a major issue. I have always preferred as ideal the notion that each DAO run its own blockchain to keep track of its own REP list. The major problem with voting is scaling. In order to have regular automated votes there is a lot of messaging that is needed if it is to remain decentralized. There is also a major difficulty in keeping the vote hidden until the period is ended. These issues have been explored in the literature and I'm confident there are solutions. But I'm ignorant about the existence of a robust product we can simply adopt.
https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/05/25/voting2.html
Craig Calcaterra (talk) 00:02, 2 March 2023 (CST)
Idea: Using the forum conception of a node as a sub-forum. I'm using SPD as an example.