Talk:DGF transcendent values: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (Craig Calcaterra moved page Talk:DGF transcendental values to Talk:DGF transcendent values: Text replacement - "transcendental" to "transcendent") |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== NOTE == | |||
Click 'Add topic' to separate subjects.<br> | |||
Please sign all comments by typing 4 tildes (~).<br> | |||
:To answer, use colons (:) to indent | |||
::Use two colons (::) to indent twice | |||
:::Etc.<br> | |||
[[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 04:26, 27 March 2023 (CDT) | |||
<br> | |||
*Ladd pointed to this [https://boingboing.net/2016/06/24/how-to-protect-the-future-web.html talk] by Cory Doctorow to the Decentralized Web Summit, entitled "How to protect the future web from its founders' own frailty". He has good points about the danger of not putting safeguards into the original design of any decentralized project. | *Ladd pointed to this [https://boingboing.net/2016/06/24/how-to-protect-the-future-web.html talk] by Cory Doctorow to the Decentralized Web Summit, entitled "How to protect the future web from its founders' own frailty". He has good points about the danger of not putting safeguards into the original design of any decentralized project. | ||
[[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 05:11, 23 March 2023 (CDT) | [[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 05:11, 23 March 2023 (CDT) | ||
== Open source license == | |||
I'm for maximal open source. I think the current Apache license is probably fine, with the basic idea that anyone can use our work for any reason, including modifying it and then using it for profit and copyrighting it--with the caveat that the only material that they own is the novel additions and that they need to acknowledge what they took and from whom. <br> | |||
I toyed with the idea of a more restrictive license: that we would require that anytime someone uses our work, they need to also publish their derivatives as open source of the same type. But I believe that leads to situations where people cannot continue the work in the face of centralized competition. Occasionally, sub-DAOs will need to centralize for efficiency's sake. Occasionally groups will need to compete with other groups by hiding their processes. Maximal freedom is sometimes the way forward. <br> | |||
[[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 04:42, 27 March 2023 (CDT) | |||
== Vision & mission statements == | |||
Vision: To achieve a just society which expresses values, promotes creativity, facilitates efficient energy management | |||
<br> | |||
Mission: To enable the creation of the first true DAO, and by extension many DAOs | |||
--Ladd (Added by [[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 18:23, 10 April 2023 (CDT)) |
Latest revision as of 18:31, 3 July 2023
NOTE[edit source]
Click 'Add topic' to separate subjects.
Please sign all comments by typing 4 tildes (~).
- To answer, use colons (:) to indent
- Use two colons (::) to indent twice
- Etc.
- Etc.
- Use two colons (::) to indent twice
Craig Calcaterra (talk) 04:26, 27 March 2023 (CDT)
- Ladd pointed to this talk by Cory Doctorow to the Decentralized Web Summit, entitled "How to protect the future web from its founders' own frailty". He has good points about the danger of not putting safeguards into the original design of any decentralized project.
Craig Calcaterra (talk) 05:11, 23 March 2023 (CDT)
Open source license[edit source]
I'm for maximal open source. I think the current Apache license is probably fine, with the basic idea that anyone can use our work for any reason, including modifying it and then using it for profit and copyrighting it--with the caveat that the only material that they own is the novel additions and that they need to acknowledge what they took and from whom.
I toyed with the idea of a more restrictive license: that we would require that anytime someone uses our work, they need to also publish their derivatives as open source of the same type. But I believe that leads to situations where people cannot continue the work in the face of centralized competition. Occasionally, sub-DAOs will need to centralize for efficiency's sake. Occasionally groups will need to compete with other groups by hiding their processes. Maximal freedom is sometimes the way forward.
Craig Calcaterra (talk) 04:42, 27 March 2023 (CDT)
Vision & mission statements[edit source]
Vision: To achieve a just society which expresses values, promotes creativity, facilitates efficient energy management
Mission: To enable the creation of the first true DAO, and by extension many DAOs
--Ladd (Added by Craig Calcaterra (talk) 18:23, 10 April 2023 (CDT))