Editing Open Discussions

== '''Proposal''': Test out [[DAO Governance Framework|DAO Governance Framework (DGF)]] with the gaming community. ie. speedrunning community, WoW, pokemon etc. ==
Inspiration: Twitch Plays Pokemon[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitch_Plays_Pok%C3%A9mon]

Tags: [[Governance Sandboxes]]

== '''Question:''' Without a treasury, how would a DAO be setup for acute problems? I'm not saying we need a big treasury, I just don't see how the DAO being totally illiquid is practical, vs. ideal. Especially, if the DAO gets more powerful/influential, I don't know how it would handle all of the different attacks without a treasury. Just as there is social redundancy in a decentralized organization, maybe it also needs financial redundancy/inefficiencies as well for survival? ==
Reference: [[Reputation tokenomics]], Oct 4 Version - Craig Calcaterra

Context: Reputation tokenomics tries to eliminate treasuries all together and have all incentives pushed to long-term/delayed payment/gratification. DGF focuses on values of stability and the long-term thinking, but DGF will need inevitably face unexpected situations so not investing in the build up of a treasury seems tenuous.