Editing List of Questions

== 2023: ==
How do emerging vs. established scientists feel about the current/legacy system?

How are different actors in Science responding to the seismic shifts in Science?

[[How will the rise of Asia change the narratives around the future of Science?]]

If it will exacerbate, what can replace it? How can a healthy buffer be created between Big Tech and Academia?

[[Will neoliberal ideas help or exacerbate the current and future state of Science?]]

There are a lot of pros to Open Science, what are the cons?

How do we manage governance so that the cons are less likely to occur?

Other than the decline effect, what other phenomena should Metascience address? 

How does Open Science - in say the US - manage/fight the professional lobbying efforts enterprise science publishing companies will fight to protect?

DeSci Labs + Weavechain in pdf computational replication?

What kind of tools can DeSci introduce immediately or within the next 6-12 months that would improve the scientific integrity and onboard some early adopters?

[[The DeSci community is generating numerous governance infrastructures. How can it create governance sandboxes so that the larger scientific community / professional society will be more likely to accept this new technology?]]

How do we design and run experiments around the efficacy of collaborative, self-governing professional societies?

How can professional societies better manage the parameter space of their field of study?

What tech/gov stacks work better than others (concensus protocol, tokenomics, voting mechanisms, inclusion/exclusion criteria)?

If AI's like Chat GPT, Deepmind, Stable Diffusion etc. is expected to be ubiquitous, how should our reputation/prestige/clout systems change?

What ways do we want to search the knowledge base?

When is a scientific fact accepted “truth”?