Editing
Judicial governance proposal
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Example judicial proposals == === Proposal to remove REP from post1 === === Proposal to donate REP to post1 === === Proposal to remove REP from post1 and donate to post2 === === Proposal to swap value from one post to another === ??Fix:[[File:WDAG Reweighting Primitive.png|center|frameless|555x555px|Reweighting the Forum]] The figure displayed illustrates a scheme for redistributing power from Post1 to Post2. In this case we can imagine governance concluding that Post1 was bad and Post2 was good. Then governance makes Post3 with power 10 REP and validates it. Then in the displayed example the Forum WDAG has been revaluated, i.e., re-weighted. This is the primitive that allows governance to review previous judgements and correct mistakes made in the past. The incinerator is a complication that allows this re-weighting action to keep the total graph weight constant. This isn't the only way to achieve re-weighting. Every approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. This approach encourages stability because it is particularly inefficient. E.g., it costs 10 to move 10, and 10 REP is destroyed. So conscious effort is required to reweight the Forum to correct past mistakes. This effort requires the sacrifice of 10 REP on the part of those who make the change (the 10 REP from Post3 was governance value). However note that in this case, the 10 REP "sacrifice" will not burden any particular member to achieve the revaluation, if it is done in concert with the governance tax. In this case the governance tax is free since the total amount of REP in the DAO before and after the revaluation is unchanged, because the excess governance tax is incinerated. === Proposal to affect multiple posts in the same manner === === Proposal to affect multiple posts in different manners === === Proposal to punish postK by slashing its REP, but not affect the posts it references === (The imagined context is that the owner of postK violated a tenet of the DAO so we want to punish them, but we don't specifically disagree with the actions and consequences of the particular postK β we just want to take away their REP without punishing anyone else who was historically involved in the work that led to the creation of REP associated with postK.) Answer: slash postK and simultaneously donate the same amount to its positive references. === Proposal to reward postK but not any of its references (inverse of previous.) === === Proposal to create a bounty === The bounty can then be leached by an approved claimant. The bounty promise can be fulfilled before or after the approved claimaint leaches from it. This example shows how some of the specific instantiations of governance proposals can be convoluted because we rely on basic primitives. However the completeness of the primitives guarantees any logical process desired has a rigorous solution.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to DAO Governance Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
DAO Governance Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information