Editing
Executive governance
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==== Exponential fees ==== Now we assume, as above, the fees follow an exponential rate [[Validation Pool#Vote|<math display="inline">f'(t):=f_0'e^{ct}</math>]] This gives[[Validation Pool#Vote|<math display="block">R(t)=R_0+\int_{0}^t m*f' (s)ds=R_0+mf_0'\frac{e^{ct}-1}{c} </math>]]Using Equation 11 we get[[Validation Pool#Vote|<math display="block">P_0^1(t) =exp\Biggl( p_3m\int _0^t \frac{f'(t)}{R(t)}\Biggr)=\Biggl(1+\frac{mf_0'}{R_0}\frac{e^{ct}-1}{c} \Biggr)^{p_3}</math>]]The single policing token gives the reputational salary[[Validation Pool#Vote|<math display="block">f_0^{1,P}(t)=\int_0^t f'(s)\frac{P_0^1(s)}{R(s)}ds=\frac{1}{mp_3}\Biggl(\biggl(1+\frac{mf_0'}{R_0}\frac{e^{ct}-1}{c}\biggr)^{p_3}-1\Biggr).</math>]] Notice policing makes a qualitative difference under exponential fees, since a passive token had salary [[Validation Pool#Vote|<math display="inline">f_0^1(t) \sim \frac {1}{m}ct </math>]] asymptotically linear, whereas policing gives [[Validation Pool#Vote|<math display="inline">f_0^{1,P}(t) \sim e^{cp_3t}</math>]] asymptotically exponential salary. This salary’s present value is<math display="block">PVf_0^{1,P}=\int_0^\infty e^{-rt} \frac{d}{dt} f_0^{1,P} (t)dt</math>which is not expressible using elementary functions, but is given by the hypergeometric function <math>2F_1</math>. Notice <math display="inline">PVf_0^{1,P}</math> is finite when <math>cp_3<r</math> and infinite otherwise. Therefore, we see that when the policing ratio <math>p_3</math> and the exponential growth rate <math>c</math> overcome the interest rate <math>r</math> we can expect explosive returns, which is a threat to the stability of the DAO since it is likely a hype cycle would form, generating unreasonable expectations of future earnings. Even though exponentially growing fees gives an exponentially growing salary, notice that the <math>R_0</math> original tokens, even if they all participate reliably in policing will be diluted in relative power according to <math display="block">\frac{R_0P_0^1(t)}{R(t)}=\frac{R_0\Biggl(1+\frac{mf_0'}{R_0}\frac{e^{ct}-1}{c} \Biggr)^{p_3}}{R_0+mf_0'\frac{e^{ct}-1}{c}}=\Biggl(1+\frac{mf_0'}{R_0}\frac{e^{ct}-1}{c} \Biggr)^{p_3-1}\rightarrow0</math> as <math>t\rightarrow \infty</math> so the DAO will predictably decentralize, even if the founders continually police the newcomers. The only way founders can maintain majority power is by bring the majority of new fees to the DAO by continually performing the majority of productive work.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to DAO Governance Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
DAO Governance Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information