Editing Talk:DAO Governance Framework (section)

== Voting Technical Issues ==


The Validation Pool is the heart of the system, so voting with REP is always a major issue. I have always preferred as ideal the notion that each DAO run its own blockchain to keep track of its own REP list. The major problem with voting is scaling. In order to have regular automated votes there is a lot of messaging that is needed if it is to remain decentralized. There is also a major difficulty in keeping the vote hidden until the period is ended. These issues have been explored in the literature and I'm confident there are solutions. But I'm ignorant about the existence of a robust product we can simply adopt. <br>
https://vitalik.ca/general/2021/05/25/voting2.html<br>
 [[User:Craig Calcaterra|Craig Calcaterra]] ([[User talk:Craig Calcaterra|talk]]) 00:02, 2 March 2023 (CST)

<br>
<br>
[https://www.loom.com/share/67c1b8ea00b948a6bb254044bfcf5452 Idea]: Using the forum conception of a node as a sub-forum. I'm using [[Science Publishing DAO|SPD]] as an example.