Editing
Criticisms of the DGF project
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Fundamental Criticisms === * [[wikipedia:Unintended_consequences|Law of Unintended Consequences]] *[[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Chesterton's_fence|Chesterton's Fence]] *[[wikipedia:Criticism_of_democracy|Criticisms of government]] ==== Over-financialization ==== Financializing every human behavior degrades the fundamental human impulse to help without expectation of reward. Under this system, everything is tied to a measured value, then accounted for and rewarded according to whatever system is currently in place, even though that system is necessarily flawed. It eliminates the possibility of selflessness, self-sacrifice, for your community. [There are more elaborated arguments<ref>Rossman, Gabriel. 2014. “Obfuscatory Relational Work and Disreputable Exchange.” ''Sociological Theory'' 32(1):43–63.</ref><ref>Zero HP Lovecraft, "The Gig-economy" (2022 re-upload) https://zerohplovecraft.substack.com/p/the-gig-economy</ref> in this vein.]<br> :Answer: It doesn't need to. This tool can be used to help us ignore the trivial accounting, by automating it with a system which is trustworthy because it is perpetually open to auditing by anyone. Then we can focus on higher-level concerns. This is the reason DGF has a primary concern with [[transcendent values]] when building DAOs. : :This tool does, however, need to be constantly sharpened--re-evaluated, improved, questioned--instead of taken for granted. But the evolutionary structure rewards that very type of continual improvement--as long as that looseness is preserved. ==== Downsides of meritocracy ==== Meritocracy without cultivating gratitude and humility is corrosive over time. Though we want somewhat of a class structure for efficiency, we don't want the gap to be large enough for the the top and bottom to dissociate. This is built in computationally with hyper-inflationary reputation, but this must also be managed emotionally. ==== Downsides to transparency ==== * Threat to privacy *... ==== Downsides of globalism ==== * Threat to local community * Inevitability of oppression * Global-level mechanisms are existential threats
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to DAO Governance Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
DAO Governance Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information