Editing
Block producer DAO
(section)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== Reference mechanism === The next sequence diagram illustrates the reference mechanism, which provides a means of bootstrapping governance by making proposals which cite older proposals. This gives an incentive mechanism for a community to organically improve the block producer protocols. [[File:RefMechanismSeqDiag2.png|center|thumb|848x848px]] For example, to improve the consensus mechanism WSC, the idea is to evolve the conversation in 4 phases. In Phase 1, people chat about improvements they would like to see. In Phase 2, a collection of improvement proposals are offered. Improvement proposals cite older proposals that they build on (detailed in the second sequence diagram, above). Improvement proposals are continually made, in perpetuity. In Phase 3, the latest favored proposal will become the active WSC, ''de facto'' because it is used by the group. The active WSC primarily rewards the worker whose ASC is selected with the newly minted REP. Secondarily the WSC sends part of this REP reward to the author of the WSC. The sub-DAG of proposals connected by references to the currently favored proposal will all be rewarded with REP and subsequently $. Proposals not connected with references are not rewarded. In Phase 4, a new type of REP is invented, called gREP, to promote active, explicit, on-chain governance of the Block producer DAO. The active WSC will be changed to include a line sharing a percentage of the monetary rewards for block production as gREP salary. Owners of gREP use it for legislative governance, i.e., to make proposals (the work of the governance wing of the DAO) and to vote on which proposals are canonized by binding validation pools using gREP. The amount set aside for governance is a continual negotiation between block producers (wREP holders), and governors (gREP holders), who will typically overlap to some degree. That amount is the dev budget. In summary, the means by which a community creates a DAO using DGF is to engender two systems: DGF flow (for executive governance) and the reference mechanism (for legislative governance).
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to DAO Governance Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
DAO Governance Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
English
Views
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information